Coaching and Mentoring
Coaching and mentoring are about as personal as training gets. Both methods offer scope for personal and professional development. And both establish close personal relationships between trainer and trainee in order to get the best out of both. Not to mention, both offer the potential to improve not just people but businesses too.
Coaching
Relative to mentoring, coaching usually lasts for a shorter period of time. It is also more defined in scope, focussing on developing specific skills and achieving particular goals.
The CIPD points out that coaching aims to foster “the achievement of organisational objectives”, thus linking the training process closely with a business’s key priorities.
Coaching can take place internally, in cases where one employee holds specific skills and knowledge which can be imparted to another. Or external coaches – who possess expert knowledge or skills not held within an organisation – can be brought in to coach an employee.
A newly appointed managing director might be coached in the ways of leadership, to guide his personal transition into a heavily leadership-focussed role, and to help navigate the business through its period of change. An executive or manager might be trained in the skills needed to raise finance, in advance of a company’s investment raising efforts. Or a buyer might be coached in the ways of negotiation, so that he can broker better deals.
Whoever is being coached, and whatever the subject, coaching is led by business needs, but focussed on developing a person’s specific skills, knowledge and job role.
Mentoring
In contrast to coaching, mentoring is a longer term process which may span several years or more. Mentoring is less specific in scope, but the process still aims to develop a single person’s skills, thinking and performance.
The Coaching & Mentoring Network describes the traditional definition of mentoring as a process which enables an individual to “follow in the path” of a more experienced colleague. This colleague can “pass on knowledge, experience, and open doors to otherwise out-of-reach opportunities”. But it also makes the point that increasingly mentoring is a term used to describe situations where mentors are brought in from outside an organisation.
The CIPD adds to this definition by describing mentoring as “the long term passing on of support, guidance and advice”. In this sense, mentoring aims to establish a longer-term relationship than coaching where the mentor is available over the course of time to support the development of their trainee.
A newly appointed marketing graduate might be paired with a more experienced marketing director, so the latter can help the former understand how his academic knowledge fits into the real business world. An aspiring young recruit may be mentored by a manager who can add knowledge to his flair and drive. Or finally, a managing director of a young company might be mentored by an experienced leader from outside his organisation, to help the company develop and grow.
Whoever is being mentored, and for whatever reason, mentoring is led by the desire to invest time into developing people. Over time, such close relationships create new talent from old.
More info – Training providers: mentoring and coaching
Support - If you would like an Organisational needs analysis or to find out more about coaching and mentoring support please call Train to Gain on 08456 047 047. A Train to Gain Skills Broker will be able to help you find the right training and support to meet your business needs.
Preventing a knowledge-loss crisis
When employees leave an organisation they take valuable knowledge with them. Research from the US argues that, in many businesses, steps designed to capture departing knowledge do not go far enough. It’s not just about what employees know, it’s about who they know, the research suggests.
The rate at which employees leave their jobs in the UK is not disastrous, but it is significant enough to raise concerns amongst employers. CIPD research estimates an overall employee turnover rate for 2007 of 17.4 per cent in the UK, with a higher rate of 20.4 per cent in the private sector. According to the research, “over 70 per cent of employers believe employees’ departure from the organisation has a negative effect on business performance”. CIPD
Separate research from the US suggests employee turnover impacts business performance because companies are not doing enough to retain the right kind of knowledge.
The research, from MIT Sloan, asserts that many organisations could fall victim of a knowledge crisis resulting from insufficient knowledge-retention processes. The authors suggest that departing employees “leave with more than what they know; they also take with them critical knowledge about who they know. That information needs to be a part of any knowledge-retention strategy.”
MIT Sloan identifies three important types of employees that should be on a knowledge-retention strategy’s radar, and recommend two key approaches to help minimise the risks of losing valuable employee knowledge:
“In our work, we have used an approach called organizational network analysis, or ONA, also known as social network analysis… ONA can highlight the unique knowledge held by three important types of employees: “central connectors” (those who are regularly asked for help, typically because they have a high level of expertise in one or more areas), “brokers” (those who act as bridges across subgroups) and “peripheral players” (those who reside on the boundaries of a network but could still possess valuable niche expertise and outside knowledge)… Thus companies need to take various measures to (1) identify key knowledge vulnerabilities by virtue of both what a person knows and how that individual’s departure will affect a network and (2) address specific knowledge-loss issues based on the different roles that employees play in the network.” MIT Sloan
Together these two reports highlight the magnitude of the problem, and provide insights useful to the development of an effective solution. Any company that is concerned about the effects of employee turnover should read more about knowledge-retention approaches and consider how such processes might reduce the negative impact of departing staff.
More info - Importance of knowledge to a business